Sorry for the absence of new posts. Those of you that know me understand my family obligations; however, we have good news for a change and I can redevote my time to further discussion.
What interests me now if looking at the overall scope of the Intro to Composition course and how the elements figure together. Specifically, I am thinking about the end of the semester. We are not necessarily talking about a "capstone" assignment, but I am interested in what we leave the students with come finals. This issue is of particular interest to me with respect to the personal essay. An upcoming paper from Dr. Janice Chernekoff on the personal essay disputes the idea that such an assignment should come first-thing in a Composition course. Having heard some of her ideas and corresponding ideas from other professors on the matter, I am intrigued to start a dialogue on the issue.
From my experience in informally listening to instructors' philosophies on the matter I get a sense of two basic arguments. One argument goes like this: "A student cannot be expected to write about anything but him or herself at the beginning of his or her college career. The student does not yet really know enough about anything else to write well on the matter. Moreover, this allows the student a certain level of comfort by making his or her first assignment about something he or she should already have an advanced understanding of." The second argument challenges this last statement: "Does the student really know about his or herself to write something meaningful."
This second argument seems to realize the great potential of writing about self and coming to far-reaching conclusions. In this line of reasoning, the student looks at his or herself last with a refined sense of making meaning. In a casual interview with Dr. Dan Featherston on the benefits of the rhetorical analysis of print advertisement assignment, Dr. F. told me that his believes it is important for his students to start with such an assignment so that they can learn to look outward first and assess the rhetorical meanings in culture and society. The student can then take these understandings and apply them to his or herself for the personal essay, making for a much more meaningful exploration of the self within the context of cultural, social, and economic rhetorics.
I have had the opportunity to have just such an experience in Dr. Chernekoff's ENU course, "Teaching Writing." To close the semester we worked on writing an auto autoethnography, a piece of writing that examines your own history of literacy. It is by no means the easy reflection piece on personal history that some might envision the personal narrative to be. It is hard work, especially when you have been given the basis to make meaningful and socially-connected observations because of the work down throughout the semester to that point and an instructor who will not accept the mediocre. I hated working on that paper; however, by the time I was done, I realized that it may very well be the most valuable thing I have ever written. Especially because I am a part of the world of Composition and Literacy, I learned valuable lessons about myself and how i fit into such a complex world of multiple contexts. But this isn't about me.
The question I have now, is how does this experience translate to the Intro to Composition course. Having spoke with Dr. Chernekoff on the matter, and thinking over my own struggles, I realize that such an assignment is a little beyond the expectations of Freshman's Comp. In fact, it may be a surefire way to make students hate writing, a consequence that must be considered when structuring a class How do you challenge them without alienating them because writing is undeniably personal and therefore makes the critiqued writer very vulnerable.
The questions has to do with the scope of the assignment. What parameters do we assign to the essay to guide our student writers? The parameters can come from the previous classwork, as Dr. Featherston suggests by looking at the rhetorical analysis of a print ad as being training to look outward before looking inward. One assignment I found to be of value and which falls in line with some of the New London Group's explorations, is an assignment I ran into in the Writing Center that came Dr. Heather Thomas. The assignment is to write a "media autobiography." The assignment asks the student to write about the importance of either specific music or television/film media in his or her life. The writer must look at his identity as an individual and as a part of a group (generally in the context of highschool and/or college society) with respect to his or her media consumption. Typical subjects look at subculture groups as defined through music and media. I find the basic idea of this assigment to be quite sound, and the question I pose to end this post, is what assignments others feel fulfill this role, or what modifications can be made to the media autobiography to increase or refocus its effectiveness.
Also, to return to my original considerations, what should these Comp. courses work towards as a final result. I like the idea of focusing in on self in relation to cultural and social contexts, but what are the other options? The portfolio, for example can accomplish something similar, but it is more focused on the overall idea of a writing process and a review of one's own process or processes. Perhaps the portfolio, a gathering of multiple drafts of the same assignment and journal entries, in conjuntion with a short reflection on the act of writing and an assesment of the developement of those multiple drafts, something similar to what I have seen with Prof. Amy Lynch-Binek, is an option worthy of consideration. In any case, I turn it over to your thoughts, reader.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
The question you pose is a difficult one, and yet one that every teacher must inevitably address when setting up an introductory writing course. I have trouble with any claim that tries setting these two different options up as "separate," "either/or" binaries. Can we ever really bracket off the "self" and claim we are writing "personal" essays? Or, to think of this from another perspective, can we ever really bracket off "culture" or "society" and claim we are writing a rhetoric-based essay?
I would argue that it is problematic to choose either of these two options, since no one lives in a world completely isolated as a "self," and yet no one is completely "socially constructed" at the same time. Expressivist pedagogy places too much emphasis on the one, while the rhetorical tradition too much emphasis on the other.
Personally, I find the cultural studies approach the best middle ground between this "either/or" dilemma--but with a slight twist. Since the movement toward cultural studies has a clear ideological history, a history strongly driven from ideas of the Left, (no matter what its defenders want to argue),I feel we need to balance its underlying ideology with material from the opposing side of the spectrum. So for example, cultural studies appreciates how many different kinds of "objects" today are suitable "texts" our students should be studying in their first few writing courses. As a backlash against "high culture," and all the problems one encounters with forcing kids to write about things like literature and Shakespeare, this movement seems bent on making us aware that every text around us, (ads, tv commercials, computer websites, etc.) are all part of a organically evolving, "meaning-laden" context within which they live. This is the "cultural context" they are a part, subject to, active member of, etc. The problem that I have with this approach, in its traditional pedagogical format, is that this movement away from "high culture" leaves students with nothing to compare/or relate the "low culture" to anymore. What I'm suggesting is that while I believe such clearly defined "high" and "low" culture doesn't exist, (in other words, I don't think the binary I set up originally can be so markedly drawn), I DO believe the ideological problems our society faces related today to class inequality, gender inequality, and race inequality demand us to "see" the differences between ways our society delineates such differences: "high" and "low" culture. For this reason, I am now blending a wide range of "cultural texts" into my classes, texts such as films, short stories, contemporary culture readings, novels, etc. This wide range of material allows us to discuss "culture" from a more broader, more ideologically balanced perspective. One example from my class that has led me to such a pedagogy relates to something you actually mentioned in your initial post. The topic was racism. The class was your traditional cultural studies framework. We had been reading predominantly all culture readings for the semester, and asking them to write about things like school, work, growing up, etc. But when racism came around, this "low
culture" pedagogy had its limits. I teach at a school where the majority of students come from white, upper class backgrounds. Writing essays grounded in their personal experiences dealing with such an issue was very difficult. They simply didn't have the personal experience to draw from to write a complex enough essay. One students even emailed me explaining this very position. Although an opposing side could argue with me here and say that this very context for the "self" (one that has no experience with racism) could be a strong enough 'context" to write a solid essay), I still believe that one way to expand our students' awareness of such difficult issues is through the blend of "high" and "low" art described above. Mixing in a short work of fiction by Richard Wright, or balancing out a culture reading with Toni Morrison, or even the movie "American History X" for that matter, does wonders for an essay topic supposed to be coming from the "self"--but a self that obviously would benefit from the opportunity to broaden his awareness in particular areas. I believe this mix of high and low art is ideologically sound, and ultimately attempts to get at some of the problems you originally, acutley, observed related to essays grounded in the self and in social contexts.
By the way Mike, you're a Fascist. That whole Center up there is a haven for politically corrupt Fascists. And I know, cause I began the whole Fascist operation. haha.
Excellant points, and falling somewhat along the lines of what my thesis concludes--cultural studies do tend to create that middle ground we of balanced mind and ego seek. More importantly, cultural studies provide a structure for that middle ground that we can use to help build a pedagogy.
And I am not a fascist, I just play one on TV.
Post a Comment